Current:Home > StocksArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -Quantum Capital Pro
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-18 13:26:55
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (997)
Related
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Are politics allowed in the workplace? How to navigate displaying political signs: Ask HR
- NASA's Dragonfly preparing to fly through atmosphere of Saturn's moon Titan
- NBA 2023-24 win totals: Predicting every team's record for the new season
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Rantanen has goal, 3 assists as Avalanche beat Islanders 7-4 for record 15th straight road win
- Pope’s big synod on church future produces first document, but differences remain over role of women
- Born after Superstorm Sandy’s destruction, 2 big flood control projects get underway in New Jersey
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- NHL rescinds ban on rainbow-colored Pride tape, allowing players to use it on the ice this season
Ranking
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Driver in Malibu crash that killed 4 Pepperdine students arrested on murder charges
- Tom Bergeron will 'never' return to 'DWTS' after 'betrayal' of casting Sean Spicer
- After 4 years, trial begins for captain in California boat fire that killed 34
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Man trapped in jewelry vault overnight is freed when timer opens the chamber as scheduled
- White House scraps plan for B-52s to entertain at state dinner against backdrop of Israel-Hamas war
- Tyson Fury continues treading offbeat career path with fight against former UFC star Francis Ngannou
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Florida officials ask US Supreme Court to block rulings limiting anti-drag show law
Slovakia swears in a new Cabinet led by a populist ex-premier who opposes support for Ukraine
Man indicted on murder charge in connection with disappearance of girl more than 20 years ago
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
Sam Bankman-Fried will testify in his own defense, lawyers say
The downsides of self-checkout, and why retailers aren't expected to pull them out anytime soon
In Rhode Island, a hunt is on for the reason for dropping numbers of the signature quahog clam